|
|
Item Posts
Sort Order
|
|
|
celica vs eclipse
|
|
Posted: 04/02/09
09:47 AM
|
|
I'd be all for the 93' AWD Celica. I've never driven the celicas, only owned and driven the 1g and 2g talons, but I think the older Celicas look nicer. The older DSMs will most likely have reliability issues if they weren't taken care of. I can only assume the Toyota will be much more reliable.
----
1994 GTO Twin Turbo
nothin wrong with front-wheel drive, I just refuse to own one
|
|
|
|
dsm4g63
New User
| Posts: 9
| Joined: 12/08
Posted: 04/02/09
11:28 AM
|
|
Dont have to explain my name says it all.... DSM!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 10/30/09
09:04 PM
|
|
I drove from massillon ohio to jacksonville florida in a 98 eclipse going 140 the whole way, i got there in 9 hours its a 17+ hour drive going 70mph or so. The eclipse's handling is the greatest, dont believe what you hear from people trust me, these cars are *** AWESOME!!!! If you get a tuner i recommend the eclipses they get great mpg, power, and handling. all of them do, i havent drivin an earlier year than a 95 so other than that a 95 and up are BOMB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|