yea but with imports its more of the feeling you get when u can beat that american mucle crap that comes with 3 times the motor.  

Import hands down.  

^ thats awesome considering your user name  

^^ I was going to say...

For me imports are more impressive, for example I was watching "supercars exposed" and they were running a modified scooby against a DB9 and Viper SRT-10, with the scooby outrunning them, and for much less money. A four cylinder four door "family car" outrunning a V10 supercar is  impressive to me.  

haha you can have problems with both cars if you ask me. muscle cars can be nice, i have a 66 ford mustang, but at the same time its over 40 years old and there are engine leaks and all that crap to worry about. but with tuners it costs money and time to get it where you can have that "wow" factor. both cars have their pros and cons its just a matter of which you like more :P  

^ word  

I like anything that looks great and performs awesome.  Whether it be import, domestic, or exotic!!  

Exotic?  

haha ya exotic, like ferrari or bugati veyrons. that type of ***  

i actually like both i drive a 88 nissan pulsar nx and i have a 81 z28 camaro im currently workin on. why waste time on liking one type of car when u can admire all of them.  

Prefer imports, but still love the old muscle cars.  

The problem with this post is that there is no definition between cars, no Import vs. Domestic or 4cyl vs 8cyl... A car is a car and no, tag or badge will take away from that. Lets conjure up a Ferrari F430 it has a V8 is it a muscle car? But its a 4.2 and it pumps out 419HP a healthy 100hp per liter, now you Honda guys; is it a Import Tuner? (it foreign...) Since in these arguments that card is always played out, but I haven't bothered to read all 1 million posts previous, but I know its there. Another example is the new V8 BMW M3 it also has a 4.0 liter V8 and it pumps out 400hp. And both  cars can take a turn... So, what's the call?

Arguments like these need a thorough examination and careful thinking before crass and baseless arguments are thrown about. I've owned plenty of musclecars, both my family and me of which I've owned 2 and I see no difference in the subject at matter...

And yes I'll stop writing so weird.  

im an import guy.

because #1 everyone has mustangs, camaro's ect.
if you see one youve seen a million.
i want something no one has or not many people.
thats why i own a fd with 500+whp.
very rare.  

everyone has mustangs or cameros? well that must mean you have one also unless you arent a part of everyone :P and thats not true, theres a difference between a car built for speed and just your run of the mill grocery getter. i see more hondas than mustangs, and a lot more than cameros. especially nice muscle. and how much money did you put into your rx7, i happen to love those cars but you give me a 1970 hemi cuda and the same amount of money you put in yours and watch your car get smoked everytime. what i dont understand is why people have to pick which they like more. i love cars, not just muscle and not just tuner. if you have a preference thats fine but each category has its goods and bads so you cant say yours is god when its just as good as another. thats just my two cents though.  

why would you assume? did i say i owned a camero or mustang?
i was just putting some names out there of a couple cars that most everyone around here have(ALABAMA).

i guess you have never seen barrett jackson before?
a hemi... you better have more money than i put in my car just to purchase it.